![]()
-------- Original Message --------
WHO DECIDES? THE PARENTS OR THE FDA? Father of 4-Year-Old Brain Tumor
Patient to Square Off Against FDA Head of Oncology
WHEN & WHERE: June 7th and 8th, 1:00 PM, Rayburn Building, Room 2154
WHAT: HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT
Washington, DC -- One of the purposes of this hearing is to investigate
the FDA's use of its authority to force cancer patients and parents of
cancer patients to accept treatments they do not want, or else face
legal action. The hearings were prompted, in part, by the recent case of
Thomas Navarro, a 4-year-old boy with a brain cancer known as
medulloblastoma. Thomas's story has recently been featured in People
Magazine, on “CNN and Time,” Tom Brokaw's NBC news, and the CBN “700
Club.” Thomas's father Jim will appear on the Fox News Channel with
Paula Zahn at 10 PM on June 8 (the day after Jim testifies) along with
Rep. Dan Burton.
Jim and Donna Navarro refused conventional therapies for Thomas after
reviewing the most recent medical literature published by some of the
most prestigious cancer centers in the country. The Navarros’ research
revealed that the FDA-mandated treatments for the disease, combination
chemotherapy and full craniospinal irradiation, produces consequences
unacceptable to the them—hearing and vision loss, hyperthyroidism,
severe mental retardation, loss of cognizant speech, stunted growth,
radiation-induced psychosis and rage disorder, secondary cancers, and in
many cases, death.
Based on these medical studies, the Navarros made a fully informed
decision to turn down chemotherapy and irradiation for their son, and to
seek other therapies. Specifically, they wanted to have Thomas treated
by Stanislaw R. Burzynski, MD, PhD, in Houston, Texas. His
antineoplaston therapy has shown excellent results against
medulloblastoma, with few side effects. Since making this decision, the
family has been stonewalled by the FDA and hounded by Child Protective
Services whose aim was to seize Thomas, subject him to these draconian,
ineffective treatments against the wishes of his parents, and to
imprison his parents for their temerity in opposing the dictates of the
FDA.
At the hearing on June 7, Jim Navarro and other parents whose children
have been harmed or killed by chemotherapy and irradiation will ask: Why
don't parents have the freedom to choose the treatment they want for
their child? Why is the FDA forcing the Navarros (and other families
throughout the country) to submit to cancer treatments that have been
proved to be ineffective and harmful (in the case of chemotherapy) or,
do irreparable damage (full craniospinal irradiation)? Why does the FDA
insist on the continued use of these harmful therapies and continue to
deny families the right to seek other, potentially beneficial
treatments?
FDA Commissioner Henney and Health & Human Services Secretary Shalala
have ignored the pleas on behalf of Thomas of many powerful people,
includingAlan Keyes, George W. Bush, Senators Orin Hatch and Tom Harkin,
and Rep. Dan Burton. Henney and Shalala also have ignored tens of
thousands of phone calls and letters, maintaining their indefensible
position in this matter.
During the hearing Jim Navarro will square off against Dr. Richard
Padzur, the FDA's head of Oncology, and one of the people responsible
for denying Thomas access to the treatment his parents have chosen for
him. There will likely be heated debate between Navarro and Pazdur,
focusing on issues such as the following: medical freedom, a parent's
right to choose a medical treatment for his child vs. the FDA's usurping
that right, and the way the FDA manipulates statistics to present
positive outcomes for treatments which are, in reality, dismal failures.
Amazingly, neither of the two mandated treatments, chemotherapy and
irradiation, have ever actually been approved by the FDA for pediatric
use. Yet, they have become the "standard of care" despite the fact that
much evidence exists to prove they do not work, can kill the child, and
certainly cause irreparable harm. Multiple studies going as far back as
the 1970s reveal the failure of these treatments, yet the FDA and the
pediatric oncology community continue to mandate these known failures as
“standard treatments,” and no one questions their authority to do so.
Child Protective Services is often used by the medical community to
strong-arm the parents into compliance.
Who should decide if it is preferable for a child to possibly live a few
years with no quality of life and intense suffering, or perhaps have a
shorter life with quality? Who should make the choice to decide to try
something that may cure their disease or extend life without the great
damage done by conventional therapies?
James Navarro is working for passage of H.R. 3677, The Thomas Navarro
FDA Patient Rights Act. This act would bar the FDA from placing
clinical holds on investigational treatments such as antineoplastons
just because the FDA believes another therapy is preferable. With the
patient's or the parents' declaration in writing that they are fully
aware of the conventional treatments and are willing to accept the risk
associated with taking an investigational drug, the FDA would have no
control of what the patient or the parents would choose.
For more information about the hearing, contact Beth Clay, Chief
Counsel, at 202-225-5074.
To Contact Jim Navarro and the Cancerbusters Foundation: please call or
e-mail Rita Starr 305-532-3113,
e-mail: ritarow@aol.com, or Pat Walter: pwalter@nni.com
For more information on Thomas Navarro and this case, please visit:
www.cancerbusters.com
Support the Thomas Navarro FDA Patient Rights Act,
HR3677, which will provide expanded access to new treatments for all
Americans, especially patients with cancer. Contact your Congressmen and
see Thomas's story: www.cancerbusters.com.
Bob's Updates Biography Tribute |